Page 63 - 2021-bfw-aufses-alr-1e
P. 63

with their legal rationales. Among those rulings:   Jakob Frank Denzinger was denaturalized, as was   5
                  that Hawaiians are not white (based on scientific   the anarchist Emma Goldman and the alleged
                  evidence); that Mexicans are not white (based   Communist spy Solomon Adler. But, beginning
                  on legal precedent); that Burmese are not white   in the early twentieth century, the Naturalization   Kathryn Schulz
                  (based on common knowledge); that Japanese   Bureau (later the Immigration and Naturalization
                  are not white (based on legal precedent); that   Service) sought to denaturalize Asians who had
                  people who are one-quarter Japanese are not   been granted citizenship by courts that were
                  white (based on legal precedent); that Syrians   either ignorant of current immigration law or
                  are white (based on scientific evidence); that   deliberately defying it. According to the legal
                  Syrians are not white (based on common     scholar Patrick Weil, this process was so far from
                  knowledge); that Arabs are white (based on   systematic as to be scattershot. In effect, it came
                  common knowledge); that Arabs are not white   down to chance: an Asian citizen who’d had the
                  (based on common knowledge); that Native   good luck to find a lenient representative of the
                  Americans are not white (based on nothing).  Naturalization Bureau then had the bad luck to
                     That is the kind of wild inconsistency that   be found by a strict one.
                  eventually compels the Supreme Court to weigh   No one knows exactly how such a person
                  in, and in 1922 it agreed to do so. Instead of   found Zarif Khan. Perhaps he tried to obtain
                  resolving the muddle, however, the Court issued   a passport, or perhaps he was summoned for
                  two rulings in under a year that made matters   jury duty, or perhaps someone read about his
                  worse. In the first, Ozawa v. United States, a   citizenship ceremony in the local papers and
                  Japanese man brought up and educated in    decided to tip off the authorities. Whatever
                  Berkeley argued that, for naturalization purposes,   happened, on August 12,1926, U.S. Attorney
                  he was white. The Court acknowledged that   Albert D. Walton — best known for helping to
                  Ozawa’s character was irreproachable, and   represent the federal government during the
                                                                              3
                  also that he had a paler complexion than many   Teapot Dome scandal  — filed a suit alleging that
                  people whose whiteness went uncontested.   Khan’s naturalization was “illegally procured.”
                  But it denied him citizenship, ruling that “the   Khan’s case arrived at a curious moment in
                  words, ‘white person’ were meant to indicate   immigration history. The year before, an Indian
                  only a person of what is popularly known as the   man from San Francisco named Vaishno Das
                  Caucasian race.” A year later, the Court took up   Bagai had been stripped of his citizenship, as
                  the case of Bhagat Singh Thind, an Indian man   had his wife and children — a particularly dire
                  who was, as the Justices reluctantly conceded,   development for a California resident, because,
                  technically Caucasian. This time, however,   by state law, those ineligible for citizenship
                  the judges ruled that “white persons” was   could not own property. Sometime later, Das
                  “synonymous with the word ‘Caucasian’ only as   Bagai told his family that he was going on
                  that word is popularly understood.”        a business trip, booked a hotel room in San Jose,
                     Like Zarif Khan, Thind had already been   and killed himself. In the note he left behind,
                  naturalized; upon ruling against him, the   he described his suicide as a political protest.
                  Supreme Court stripped him of his citizenship.   “I came to America thinking, dreaming, and
                  For most of U.S. history, that process, called   hoping to make this land my home,” he wrote.
                  denaturalization, was used to revoke citizenship
                  that had been fraudulently obtained, or to remove
                                                             3 An early 1920s scandal involving oil companies that paid bribes to
                  from the ranks of Americans felons, traitors.   people in the highest offices of the U.S. government for the right to
                  and war criminals. The former Auschwitz guard   drill on federal land. — Eds.
                                                                                                          43
                     Copyright © 2021 by Bedford, Freeman & Worth High School Publishers. Uncorrected proofs have been used in this sample chapter.
                       Distributed by by Bedford, Freeman & Worth High School Publishers. Strictly for use with its products. Not for redistribution.



          AufsesALR1e_24889_ch05_002_097.indd   43                                                   5/4/2020   3:57:59 PM
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68