Page 14 - 2023-bfw-strayer-wow-5e-new.indd
P. 14

216     PERIOD 2 • The Early Modern World, 1450–1750


                                   colonial  era,  mestizo  numbers  grew  substantially,  becoming  the  majority  of  the
                                   population in Mexico sometime during the nineteenth century. Such multiracial
                                   people were divided into dozens of separate groups known as  castas (castes), based
                                   on their precise racial heritage and skin color.
                ®
              AP    EXAM TIP          Mestizos were largely Hispanic in culture, but Spaniards looked down on them
              Look back at other   during much of the colonial era, regarding them as illegitimate, for many were not
              empires in history. How   born of “proper” marriages. Despite this attitude, their growing numbers and the
              were nonelites treated?   economic usefulness of their men as artisans, clerks, supervisors of labor gangs, and
              Compare these examples
              from earlier empires to   lower-level officials in both church and state bureaucracies led to their recognition
              the treatment of     as a distinct social group. Mestizas, women of various racial backgrounds, worked as
              nonelites in Latin   domestic servants or in their husbands’ shops, wove cloth, and manufactured candles
              America.
                                   and cigars, in addition to performing domestic duties. A few became quite wealthy.
                                   An illiterate mestiza named Mencia Perez successively married two reasonably
                                   well-to-do Spanish men and, upon their deaths, took over their businesses, becom-
                                   ing in her own right a very rich woman by the 1590s. At that point, no one would
                                   have referred to her as a mestiza. Particularly in Mexico, mestizo identity blurred
                                   the sense of sharp racial difference between Spanish and Native American peoples
                                   and became a major element in the identity of modern Mexico. More recently,
                                   however, the use of the term “mestizo” has been criticized for being associated with
                                   colonialism, for privileging lighter-skinned people, and for distancing individuals
                                   from those of African background.
                                      At the bottom of Mexican and Peruvian colonial societies were the  Indigenous
                                   peoples, known to Europeans as “Indians.” Traumatized by the Great Dying, they
                                   were subject to gross abuse and exploitation as the primary labor force for the
                                   mines and estates of the Spanish Empire and were required to render tribute
                                     payments to their Spanish overlords. Their empires dismantled by Spanish conquest,
                                   their religions attacked by Spanish missionaries, and their diminished numbers forc-
                                   ibly relocated into larger settlements, many Indians gravitated toward the world
                                   of their conquerors. Many learned Spanish; converted to Christianity; moved to
                                   cities to work for wages; ate the meat of cows, chickens, and pigs; used plows and
                                   draft  animals rather than traditional digging sticks; and took their many grievances
                                   to Spanish courts. Indian women endured some distinctive conditions because
                                     Spanish legal codes generally defined them as minors rather than responsible adults.
                                   As those codes took hold, Indian women were increasingly excluded from the
                                   courts or represented by their menfolk. This made it more difficult to maintain
                                   female property rights. In 1804, for example, a Maya legal petition identified eight
                                   men and ten women from a particular family as owners of a piece of land, but the
                                   Spanish translation omitted the women’s names altogether.
                                      But much that was Indigenous persisted.  At the local level, Indian male
                                     authorities retained a measure of autonomy, and traditional markets operated
                                     regularly. Both Andean and Maya women continued to leave personal property to
                                   their female descendants. Maize, beans, and squash persisted as the major  elements
                                   of Indian diets in Mexico. Christian saints in many places blended easily with
                                      Uncorrected proofs have been used in this sample.
                                      Copyright © Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishers.
                Distributed by Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishers. For review purposes only. Not for redistribution.


          07_strayerap5e_40930_ch04_202-259_2pp.indd   216                                              7/4/22   9:49 AM
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19