Page 30 - 2023-bfw-TLC-4e
P. 30

likely years in the making. When using current events and historical information as evi-
                  dence, you should be especially aware of this fallacy. Check your facts. Consider the
                  complexity of the situation. Proceed with caution.








                    Identifying Fallacies in Visual Texts

                    As we’ve established, visual texts can use evidence and make claims just like their
                    written counterparts; therefore, the arguments of visual texts are equally prone to logical
                  fallacies. In fact, because a visual text can’t develop its argument in an extended form
                  and must rely  heavily on  pathos,  it’s even  more likely that  the connection between
                    evidence and claim rests on tenuous assumptions or nebulous reasoning.
                       For example, let’s examine this ad from PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment
                  of Animals).                                                                               Analyzing Visual Texts











                                                                                        fatihhoca/Getty Images








                       Our attention is first captured by the arrow pointing to a young girl biting into a
                  cheeseburger. The girl’s arms, hands, and round face reveal that she is overweight. She
                  is dressed in fairly somber colors (gray and white), and she is not looking at the viewer.
                  Instead, she is focused on the burger, which is situated roughly in the center of the image.
                       Beneath the girl, we read the major premise of the advertisement in large, bold print:
                  “Feeding Kids Meat Is CHILD ABUSE” — a statement that, on its face, many would  dismiss
                  as ridiculous. However, the text at the bottom of the ad makes the supposed connection
                  between meat and child abuse clearer: “Fight the Fat: Go Vegan.” The  conclusion the
                  audience is meant to reach is that feeding kids meat will make them fat, and “fighting” fat-
                  ness is a goal so obviously worthy it does not need explanation. Each component of the
                  text is arranged to follow the natural downward path of the eye as the argument unfolds.
                       So what is PETA’s reasoning here? The ad operates from a premise that there is
                  something wrong with being fat and that “fighting” it is a self-evident necessity. Judging

                                                                                                          87


               Uncorrected proofs have been used in this sample. Copyright © Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishers.
                                     Distributed by Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishers.
                                        For review purposes only. Not for redistribution.
          03_sheatlc4e_40925_ch02_058_111_4pp.indd   87                                                 8/9/22   2:54 PM
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35